Amaran terbaru yang dikeluarkan oleh pihak polis terhadap penganjur demonstrasi yang dirancang sempena lawatan Presiden Amerika Syarikat, Donald Trump, bagi Sidang Kemuncak ASEAN merupakan satu pelanggaran jelas terhadap Perlembagaan Persekutuan dan penyalahgunaan kuasa.
Sebarang cubaan untuk menghalang atau menakut-nakutkan rakyat daripada melaksanakan hak perlembagaan mereka untuk berhimpun secara aman adalah satu tindakan yang mencabuli prinsip kedaulatan undang-undang dan menghakis asas demokrasi Malaysia.
Hak setiap warganegara untuk berhimpun secara aman dan tanpa senjata bukanlah satu keistimewaan yang boleh diberi atau ditarik balik mengikut budi bicara pihak berkuasa; ia merupakan kebebasan asasi yang dijamin di bawah Perkara 10(1)(b) Perlembagaan Persekutuan, dan menjadi tiang seri kepada penyertaan demokratik serta akauntabiliti awam.
Walaupun Perkara 10(2) membenarkan hak tersebut dikenakan sekatan yang dianggap perlu atau wajar oleh Parlimen demi kepentingan keselamatan atau ketenteraman awam, sekatan itu mestilah sentiasa munasabah, seimbang dan selaras dengan tujuan jaminan perlembagaan tersebut. Sebagai agensi penguatkuasaan undang-undang utama, pihak polis terikat secara perlembagaan dan perundangan untuk menghormati, melindungi serta memudahkan pelaksanaan hak ini.
Keputusan terkini Mahkamah Persekutuan telah menegaskan bahawa pihak polis mempunyai tanggungjawab positif untuk membolehkan dan membantu penganjuran perhimpunan aman, dan bahawa peranan mereka bukan untuk menekan atau menghalang perhimpunan sedemikian, tetapi untuk memastikan ia berlangsung dengan selamat dan mengikut undang-undang. Keputusan tersebut menegaskan bahawa hak untuk berhimpun tidak boleh diketepikan melalui keputusan pentadbiran atau kebimbangan spekulatif mengenai kemungkinan berlakunya kekacauan.
Sehubungan dengan itu, kenyataan polis yang menyatakan bahawa perhimpunan yang dicadangkan “tidak akan dibenarkan” serta ancaman untuk menyuraikan peserta adalah bertentangan dengan jaminan perlembagaan dan bercanggah dengan keputusan Mahkamah Persekutuan.
Kedudukan lokasi perhimpunan yang dicadangkan berhampiran “zon merah” Sidang Kemuncak ASEAN bukanlah alasan yang sah untuk mengharamkan perhimpunan tersebut, selagi para peserta tidak melintasi kawasan larangan rasmi yang telah ditetapkan. Hak untuk berhimpun secara aman di tempat awam tidak boleh dinafikan hanya kerana kedudukannya berhampiran acara rasmi atau kehadiran kenamaan.
Oleh itu, kami menyeru pihak polis untuk menarik balik ancaman tindakan penguatkuasaan dan sebaliknya berunding serta bekerjasama secara aktif dengan penganjur bagi memastikan demonstrasi berkenaan dapat dijalankan secara aman dan menurut lunas undang-undang.
Waytha Moorthy Ponnusamy
The recent warning issued by the police against organisers of the planned demonstration in conjunction with the visit of President Donald Trump for the ASEAN Summit is a clear violation of the Federal Constitution and an abuse of authority. Any attempt to prohibit or intimidate citizens from exercising their constitutional right to peaceful assembly strikes at the heart of the rule of law and erodes the very foundations of Malaysia’s democracy.
The right of all citizens to assemble peaceably and without arms is not a privilege to be granted or withdrawn at the discretion of the authorities; it is a fundamental liberty enshrined in Article 10(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution, forming an essential pillar of democratic participation and public accountability.
While Article 10(2) allows for such rights to be subject to restrictions as Parliament may deem necessary or expedient in the interest of security or public order, such restrictions must always be reasonable, proportionate, and consistent with the purpose of the constitutional guarantee. The police, as the primary law enforcement agency, are constitutionally and statutorily bound to respect, protect, and facilitate the exercise of this right.
Recent Federal Court rulings have asserted the police have a positive duty to enable and assist peaceful assemblies, and that their role is not to suppress or prevent such gatherings, but to ensure they take place safely and lawfully. The decision underscores that the right to assemble cannot be negated by administrative fiat or speculative apprehension of disorder.
In light of this binding precedent, the police statement declaring that the proposed assembly “will not be permitted” and threatening to disperse participants is inconsistent with constitutional guarantees and contrary to the Federal Court’s pronouncement.
The proximity of the proposed venue to the designated “red zone” for the ASEAN Summit is not, in itself, a lawful basis for prohibition, so long as demonstrators remain outside the officially demarcated restricted area. The right to assemble peacefully in public spaces cannot be extinguished merely due to geographical proximity to official events or dignitaries.
Accordingly, we urge the police to withdraw the threat of enforcement action and instead engage proactively with the organisers to ensure that the demonstration proceeds peacefully and in accordance with the law.
Waytha Moorthy Ponnusamy
The latest leadership crisis in the Malaysian Indian Community Transformation Unit (MITRA) is not a coincidence, nor is it merely a matter of administrative confusion. It is the result of a deliberate and calculated political manoeuvre by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to divide Indian leaders within his own party and deflect blame from his consistent failure to deliver real progress for the Indian community.
By orchestrating a revolving-door leadership in MITRA — first appointing an all party committee chaired by Ramanan, then shifting it to Saraswathy, less than a year later installing P. Prabakaran as a sole Chairman, and now abruptly reinstating R. Ramanan under opaque circumstances . Anwar is fuelling infighting among Indian leaders in PKR and DAP. This internal conflict is not accidental; it servesAnwar’s political purpose. It keeps Indian leaders and community distracted and at odds with one another while the real culprit – PM himself remains untouched.
MITRA’s ineffectiveness is shifted onto the Indian leaders themselves, giving the false impression that the failures are due to their infighting. This is a classic divide-and-rule tactic, executed to perfection by Anwar. As Indian MPs and leaders scramble for clarity and control, Anwar positions himself as a distant, uninvolved authority — above the fray, and conveniently absolved of all responsibility.
But the truth is this: Anwar has consistently failed to introduce meaningful policies or allocate sufficient resources for the socio-economic upliftment of Indians, especially in the 13th Malaysia Plan. MITRA, which should have been a vehicle for empowerment, has instead become a symbol of neglect, confusion, and manipulation — all under his watch.
This is not leadership — this is manipulation. The Indian community must see through the illusion. The repeated failures of MITRA are not the fault of individual Indian leaders, but the result of a Prime Minister who discriminates, fabricates a false narrative of a multiracial Malaysia, and systematically shortchanges the Indian community.
Waytha Moorthy Ponnusamy